Genaro Molina | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images
Will the vast majority of travelers forgive Southwest Airlines and begin buying tickets on the main U.S. air carrier again?
To reply the query, it helps to have a deep knowledge in industrial aviation information technology operations, which protected to say, isn’t something most travelers possess or travel web sites offer to consumers researching the newest airfares.
Southwest Airlines accepted the blame for its technological meltdown in the course of the holidays, and it has committed over $1 billion to fixing it. The airline conceded what critics had ben saying for years and after the crisis were in a position to say much more forcefully — and to a much wider, angrier audience. It had not invested enough in scheduling software and consequently did not have staff in place properly, and couldn’t catch up once the system began cascading with flight cancellations.
In accordance with airline experts who took part in a recent CNBC Technology Executive Council Town Hall, there’s been some signs of panic from the airline in answering this query itself.
“People have been booking away from Southwest in January and February. Southwest is, from my perspective, in a moderate state of panic,” said Henry Harteveldt, Atmosphere Research Group president and a travel industry analyst and advisor who formerly worked in airline marketing. He pointed to $29 fare sales, “something I have not seen Southwest offer in an extended time,” he said. Bonus offers and other incentives to join bank cards, and companion passes for frequent fliers, are other examples of great advantages for passengers value considering as a return traveler to Southwest, he said, but added, “These aren’t the actions of an airline that’s seeing business flow across the transom at the extent they expect.”
Leisure travelers will return if the airline can prove its return to a former level of reliability, he said, but business travelers could also be more reluctant, he added, depending on where they live and what other flight options they’ve. The largest problem, though, is not the front-facing consumer efforts but that even a billion-plus dollars on operations spending cannot guarantee that Southwest steers clear of one other tech meltdown in the long run. One other very bad storm could produce similar results before an efficient tech solution may be implemented.
A part of the problem is industrywide. While Harteveldt said there are examples of airlines doing a greater job of investing in specialized systems required for the most important operators, it is barely a couple of of the over 5,000 airlines worldwide which are making the needed investments. Within the U.S., he highlighted United Airlines, and globally, he pointed to love Singapore, Emirates, Air France, KLM group, IAG and Qantas, “which are doing numerous smart things.” But he also said, “Every airline is only one bad storm, one major event, away from a disruption.”
“I do not see a path for them to recuperate from complex, irregular operations like this on a standard day, with 100 to 200 flight cancellations,” said Eash Sundaram, JetBlue Airways former chief digital and technology officer. “I feel the pain of what the Southwest team went through. It is not going to be easy for them to administer that form of a one-off storm that hit them hard.”
Southwest declined a chance to participate within the Town Hall, but offered emailed comments from a spokeswoman afterwards addressing concerns voiced by the aviation experts, including the next:
“Over the past five years, we implemented quite a few large-scale technology and business projects. This yr, we’ve got planned a $1.3 billion spend on upgrades and maintenance of our IT systems. The recent disruption accelerated plans to reinforce our processes and we’re heavily focused on assuring our customers experience Southwest’s 51-year history of protected, reliable, and hospitable air travel.”
Listed here are a few of the highlights from the TEC conversation during which the aviation experts explained the explanations for his or her ongoing wariness.
Why $1 billion cannot buy confidence in Southwest
A part of the issue is throughout the company. It is a criticism that you just don’t must be an aviation expert to now know in spite of everything of the headline attention and hearings on Capitol Hill. Southwest’s plan to take a position greater than $1 billion in technology upgrades is a start, but Harteveldt told TEC members it is tough to have much confidence in Southwest as a tech company given the longer history.
“Southwest Airlines has a culture of kicking the technology can down the road for all 52 years of its history, began under Herb Kelleher, who’s an excellent guy, great personality, but hated to spend money on anything that did not fly or bring a customer in,” he said.
Harteveldt noted that until 2017, Southwest was running on a reservation system “whose guts belong to Braniff,” an airline that went out of business in Nineteen Eighties. “They’ve failed, summarily and consistently,” he said. “You may spend $1.3 billion on tech, but when it isn’t spent on the best systems in the best way, you are still going to have problems,” he added.
He also noted the recent warning signs ultimately went unheeded. In October 2021, there have been air traffic control systems issues in Jacksonville that led to a short lived shut down, and “slightly little bit of bad weather that threw Southwest off for days and price them $75 million. They didn’t decide to learn from that,” he said.
How the airline talks about technology is a component of the issue
Helane Becker, airlines analyst at Cowen & Co, has covered the industry for many years and watched Southwest grow from being a small airline throughout the state of Texas to the most important domestic U.S. airline with about 21% market share.
Becker says that the best way Southwest runs its network, a “point to point” approach that may send a Southwest Airlines’ plane from Fort Lauderdale to Dallas, LA to San Francisco to Denver to Dallas, “in a day” with out a hub getting used like a United Airlines’ plane out of Newark, makes its network unique in the case of crew management.
“They were under investing in crew scheduling,” she said.
The Southwest spokeswoman said the airline has an extended history of innovation and pioneering technology within the airline industry. “As one in every of the primary airlines to issue paperless tickets, launch an internet site, introduce a mobile app and more, we have continued to take a position in modernizing our operations,” she said.
But Becker said the deal with the consumer-facing technology is a component of the issue given the complex nature of its hub-less network. “They did numerous investment in customer facing things, making it easier to book on the app, making it easier to book through the online, and so forth. Joining Amadeus and joining Sabre, making it easy for business people to book. They didn’t make it very easy for his or her employees. That is the part that is been missing,” she said.
Where there’s never enough money spent on airline IT
Sundaram said having been an airline chief tech executive, it is important to grasp there may be at all times a budget challenge in place in the case of investment in operations tech relative to industrial systems.
“Living the lifetime of an airline CIO, CTO for 10 years, there was never enough money to spend,” he said. “There’s at all times a constrained budget. The industrial systems at all times take the priority because that is the apparent visible stuff.”
“Historically, the operations space is the least invested,” Sundaram added.
BALTIMORE, MD – DEC 27: A whole lot of passengers wait in line to handle their baggage claim issues with Southwest Airlines at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport in Baltimore, Maryland on December 27, 2022.
The Washington Post | The Washington Post | Getty Images
There may be also the problem of the sheer variety of systems in use. Airlines don’t run on one big system, or two big systems split between operations and industrial. JetBlue had a whole lot of various systems, he said, “that discuss with one another to get that plane flying and customers checked in.” And the systems were developed over 50-plus years of advancements in aviation, way back to things in-built Seventies that communicate within the aviation industry.
From crew management to crew scheduling and crew communication, “it’s an entire ecosystem of multiple systems. It is not only one big system that runs it. At JetBlue, we tried to extensively scan the marketplace, and there’s not one single provider that truly could fit the needs of JetBlue,” he said.
Airlines also don’t love to vary the systems not seen by consumers. Unlike a industrial system, which may be modified multiple times a yr, “the operations folks, whether it’s crew scheduling or flight planning or communication, there may be regulation surrounding these technologies which are like form of rigid, and that you do not need to vary daily,” he said.
Mix that with the shortage of return on investment from IT, and based on his experience at JetBlue, Sundaram said it’s a difficulty that will require airlines to work together quite than pointing to Southwest as the issue.
The complexity and the shortage of ROI have historically pushed many firms to say, “We’ll wait for the subsequent person to construct this,” but he added, “Any individual needs to check out it as a macro industry and say we’re gonna spend money on this platform and serve 100-plus airlines. … It’s too expensive to construct one-off tooling for a Southwest or JetBlue or an American. And it is going to take way too long unless the industry comes together.”
A chief information officer decision that’s questioned
Harteveldt pointed to an organizational reason why he stays lower than confident in leaving this problem to Southwest.
As a part of its post-crisis decisions, Southwest named a latest chief information officer, Lauren Woods, but she isn’t a direct report back to the CEO. Woods reports to chief administration & communications officer Linda Rutherford. “They’re having the person report back to the manager who also runs PR. That is not the way you structure it,” Harteveldt said. “Every CIO on this call knows the CIO must report back to the CEO or at the very least the president of the corporate.”
The Southwest spokeswoman called that a mischaracterization of Rutherford’s role. “The Chief Information Officer position has reported to varied Leaders over time, including the position that Linda Rutherford currently holds. Linda Rutherford’s role as Chief Administration and Communications Officer brings together technology work happening throughout the Company,” she wrote.
But many tech executives agree with Harteveldt. In the present business world, no matter industry, technology is so fundamental to operations that the highest tech officer needs a direct line to the CEO. The Southwest issues are a very good, cautionary tale for top tech officers to take into the CEO’s office, Harteveldt said. “Should you haven’t got strong technology, infrastructure, in the event you aren’t innovating or at the very least testing things, you won’t have a powerful P&L. You won’t have a powerful balance sheet.”
That is an argument that a CTO or CIO can win, though it could take time, and never having a direct line to the CEO won’t help. One transportation executive told peers on the Town Hall — TEC members, unlike guest speakers, participate under Chatham House rules in order that they can speak freely — that three years ago his CEO pushed back against his requests for investment and told him something just like what contributed to the Southwest issues: to deal with the technology for the corporate’s consumer-facing products, “and never the opposite side.”
“It took me three years to persuade him that we are actually a technology company. And we must always deal with technology first,” the manager said.
What ultimately led to the CEO’s agreement: seeing the entire company’s competitors placing these technology goals at the highest of the list.
Avoiding the subsequent flight system meltdown may take too long
Even with over $1 billion to spend on technology, Becker estimates it can take at the very least a yr to a year-and-a-half, sometime between now and 2025, for Southwest to do what it might probably on the IT end. And between at times, there isn’t any guarantee one other set of issues, weather and systems related, won’t end in the same situation for travelers.
“I’m not saying the identical thing will repeat,” Sundaram said. “We have all learned from our past mistakes,” he said, noting JetBlue experienced at the very least a handful of major storms, not all of which resulted in “complete meltdowns,” though the airline did experience meltdowns, too. Procedurally, he said there are other things airlines can do while IT investments are falling short, with workforce management and cancellation policies as examples, to “mitigate a few of this risk.”
But he was clear in regards to the high hurdle to a fast tech fix: “You are not going to seek out a system in the subsequent 12 months to resolve this. And the likelihood they’ll have a storm in the subsequent 12 months is just about there.”
“The query is, how long does it take to take a position in a comprehensive crew management ecosystem? There may be none today that addresses the necessity of a giant airline like Southwest,” Sundaram said. “In the event that they had one out of the box available, they’d have gone and acquired that. That is multiple years to go construct it and with Southwest taking the danger of constructing all of it by themselves. Or should the industry say we’ve got 100-plus commercially viable airlines which might use this and someway determine a approach to spend money on constructing that?”