Apple has failed to steer a US appeals court to pause key parts of a federal judge’s order requiring the iPhone maker to instantly open its lucrative App Store to more competition.
The ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected Apple’s request to place the provisions on hold because the tech company appeals the judge’s order, which got here in a long-running antitrust lawsuit brought by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games.
US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April found Apple in contempt of an earlier injunction order she issued within the Epic Games case.
Apple in a press release said it was “disenchanted with the choice not to remain the district court’s order, and we’ll proceed to argue our case through the appeals process.”
The judge on April 30 ordered Apple to finish several practices that she said were designed to avoid the injunction, including a brand new 27% fee Apple imposed on app developers when its customers complete an app purchase outside the App Store.
The court also prohibited Apple from restricting where developers place links to make purchases outside of an app.
Epic Games founder and chief executive Tim Sweeney said in a post on X after the appeals court ruling that the “long national nightmare of the Apple tax is ended.”
In its emergency appeal, Apple said the ruling blocked the corporate from “exercising control over core elements of its business operations” and compelled it to provide free access to its services.
Epic Games countered that Apple was attempting to proceed evading competition and collecting fees that the judge had barred.
Apple has faced a “surge of real competition” since Gonzalez Rogers issued her April injunction, as developers updated apps with “higher payment methods, higher deals, and higher consumer selection,” Epic said.
Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and the way apps are distributed to consumers.
Apple mostly won the case, but Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options.
Apple defied that court order to take care of a revenue stream value billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers wrote in April.
She also said Apple had misled the court about its efforts to comply along with her injunction and referred the corporate and one in every of its executives to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation.
Apple has failed to steer a US appeals court to pause key parts of a federal judge’s order requiring the iPhone maker to instantly open its lucrative App Store to more competition.
The ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected Apple’s request to place the provisions on hold because the tech company appeals the judge’s order, which got here in a long-running antitrust lawsuit brought by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games.
US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April found Apple in contempt of an earlier injunction order she issued within the Epic Games case.
Apple in a press release said it was “disenchanted with the choice not to remain the district court’s order, and we’ll proceed to argue our case through the appeals process.”
The judge on April 30 ordered Apple to finish several practices that she said were designed to avoid the injunction, including a brand new 27% fee Apple imposed on app developers when its customers complete an app purchase outside the App Store.
The court also prohibited Apple from restricting where developers place links to make purchases outside of an app.
Epic Games founder and chief executive Tim Sweeney said in a post on X after the appeals court ruling that the “long national nightmare of the Apple tax is ended.”
In its emergency appeal, Apple said the ruling blocked the corporate from “exercising control over core elements of its business operations” and compelled it to provide free access to its services.
Epic Games countered that Apple was attempting to proceed evading competition and collecting fees that the judge had barred.
Apple has faced a “surge of real competition” since Gonzalez Rogers issued her April injunction, as developers updated apps with “higher payment methods, higher deals, and higher consumer selection,” Epic said.
Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and the way apps are distributed to consumers.
Apple mostly won the case, but Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options.
Apple defied that court order to take care of a revenue stream value billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers wrote in April.
She also said Apple had misled the court about its efforts to comply along with her injunction and referred the corporate and one in every of its executives to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation.
