Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, attends the 54th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum, in Davos, Switzerland, January 18, 2024.
Denis Balibouse | Reuters
DAVOS, Switzerland — Sam Altman said he was “surprised” by The Latest York Times’ lawsuit against his company, OpenAI, saying its artificial intelligence models didn’t have to train on the publisher’s data.
Describing the legal motion as a “strange thing,” Altman said OpenAI had been in “productive negotiations” with the Times before news of the lawsuit got here out. Based on Altman, OpenAI desired to pay the outlet “a number of money to display their content” in ChatGPT, the firm’s popular AI chatbot.
“We were as surprised as anybody else to read that they were suing us in The Latest York Times. That was kind of an odd thing,” the OpenAI leader said on stage on the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday.
He added that he is not that anxious by the Times’ lawsuit, and that a resolution with the publisher is not a top priority for OpenAI.
“We’re open to training [AI] on The Latest York Times, but it surely’s not our priority,” Altman said in front of a packed Davos crowd.
“We actually need not train on their data,” he added. “I believe that is something that folks don’t understand. Anybody particular training source, it doesn’t move the needle for us that much.”
The Times sued each Microsoft and OpenAI late last yr, accusing the businesses of alleged copyright infringement through using its articles as training data for its AI models.
The news outlet seeks to carry Microsoft and OpenAI accountable for “billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages” related to the “illegal copying and use of The Times’s uniquely useful works.”
Within the suit, the Times showed examples through which ChatGPT spewed out near-identical versions of the publisher’s stories. OpenAI has disputed the Times’ allegations.
The legal motion has ignited worries that more media publishers could go after OpenAI with similar claims. Other outlets want to partner with the firm to license their very own content, slightly than battle it out in court. Axel Springer, as an illustration, has a take care of the corporate where it licenses its content.
OpenAI responded to the Times’ lawsuit earlier this yr, saying in a press release that instances of “regurgitation,” or spitting out entire “memorized” parts of specific pieces of content or articles, “is a rare bug that we’re working to drive to zero.”
In that very same statement, the AI developer said that it really works to collaborate with news organizations and create latest revenue and monetization opportunities for the industry. “Training is fair use, but we offer an opt-out since it’s the appropriate thing to do,” the corporate said.
Altman’s comments echo remarks the AI leader made at an event organized by Bloomberg in Davos earlier this week. Then, Altman said that he wasn’t that anxious in regards to the Times’ lawsuit, disputed the publisher’s allegations and said there can be plenty of how to monetize news content in the long run.
“There’s all of the negatives of those people being like … don’t do that, however the positives are, I believe there’s going to be great latest ways to eat and monetize news and other published content,” Altman said.
“And for each one Latest York Times situation, we now have many more super productive things about people who are excited to construct the long run and never do the theatrics.”
Altman added there have been ways in which OpenAI could tweak the corporate’s GPT models, in order that they do not regurgitate any stories or features posted online online word for word
“We don’t need to regurgitate another person’s content,” he said. “But the issue just isn’t as easy because it sounds in a vacuum. I believe we will get that number down and down and down, quite low. And that looks like a brilliant reasonable thing to judge us on.”
